Everything Food & Drink:Deletion policy
You are welcome to assist Everything Food & Drink in its construction by editing it as well.
|This page documents an official Everything Food & Drink project policy, a widely accepted standard that all users should follow. Before editing this page, please make sure that your revision reflects consensus.
If in doubt, consider discussing changes on the talk page.
The Everything Food & Drink deletion policy describes how pages that do not meet the relevant criteria for content of the cookbook are identified and removed from Everything Food & Drink.
Deletion of an Everything Food & Drink page removes the current version and all previous versions from public view. Unlike page blanking, which can be performed (or reverted) by any user, deletion can be performed only by administrators. Administrators can also view deleted pages and reverse ("undelete") any deletion. All such actions are logged. If in doubt as to whether there is consensus to delete a page, administrators will normally not delete it.
Reasons for deletion
Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):
- Vandalism, including inflammatory redirects, pages that exist only to disparage their subject, patent nonsense, or gibberish
- Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)
- Content forks (unless a merger or redirect is appropriate)
- Redundant or otherwise useless templates
- Categories representing overcategorization
- Files that are unused or obsolete
- Any other use of the article, template, project, or user namespace that is contrary to the established separate policy for that namespace.
- Any other content not suitable for a cookbook
Editing and discussion
Disputes over page content are usually not dealt with by deleting the page, except in severe cases. The content issues should be discussed at the relevant talk page, and other methods of dispute resolution should be used first, such as listing on requests for comments for further input. Deletion discussions that are really unresolved content disputes may be closed by an uninvolved editor, and referred to the talk page or other appropriate forum.
Disagreement over a policy or guideline is not dealt with by deleting it. Similarly, issues with an inappropriate user page can often be resolved through discussion with the user.